« FRE 404(b): Government Use of Defendant's Prior Drug Conviction to Prove Intent Leads to Reversal | Main | 4th Amendment Search and Seizure: Six Day Delay by Police to Get Search Warrant for Cell Phone Is Not Unreasonable »

April 25, 2012

Comments

Mark Renken Law

This appeal is from the district court's confirmation of defendant's sentence following this court's previous remand directing it to reconsider that sentence. Defendant-appellant Willy Marroquin insists that the district court continues to err by denying him a one-level decrease pursuant to United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual ("U.S.S.G.") § 3E1.1(b)(2).1

converse cuir femme

Li te vle asire w ke li te gen tout enfòmasyon ki li te bezwen soti nan ofisye a ak pwofite li te vle konsilte avèk AUSA lan, tout pandan la patisipe nan lòt devwa li anfòsman lalwa. Nou jwenn ki te estanda sa a te rankontre isit la ak ki reta a sis-jou pa t 'konsa rezonab kòm vyole Konstitisyon an..

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Become a Fan